Showing posts with label Education Funding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Education Funding. Show all posts

Monday, March 17, 2008

Contact Info for Elected Officials

People keep asking how to get in touch with our elected officials. Here' s the contact info for our state legislators and city councilors. Please share whatever information you receive with others.

State Legislators

Rep. Peter Kocot Local Phone:582-6111 State House: 617-722-2210 Rep.PeterKocot@hou.state.ma.us

Sen. Stan Rosenberg Local Phone: 584-1649 State House: 617-722-1532 Sen.StanRosenberg@senate.state.ma.us



City Councilors

James Dostal, At-Large
City Council President 586-1390
jmdostal@comcast.net

Michael Bardsley, At-Large 586-1431
michael.bardsley@verizon.net

Maureen Carney Ward 1 584-2904
mtcarney@comcast.net

Paul Spector Ward 2 413-250-5226
gwanorth@aol.com

Robert C. Reckman Ward 3 584-8905
BobReckman@aol.com

David Narkewicz Ward 4 586-7230
dnarkewicz@comcast.net

David A. Murphy Ward 5 586-5461
david.murphy8@comcast.net

Marianne LaBarge Ward 6 584-7937
mlabargeward6@aol.com

Raymond LaBarge Ward 7 584-5561


Please pass this info along to others. And stay tuned for more info.

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Closing Tax Loopholes and Municipal Flexibility on New Taxes

Last day of school in Northampton today. It was clear that students and teachers alike looked pretty relieved. But the relief felt short-lived when we started talking at a neighborhood end-of-school year party about the dire state of our school system.

Fortunately, there's one bright spot this year. The Patrick Administration is actually trying to get some legislative action on closing tax loopholes and granting municipalities the right to determine local tax vehicles to fund services.

Take a look at this notice from Neighbor to Neighbor. Though the hike to Boston for their rally tomorrow might be difficult on short notice, at least we can still call Sen. Stan Rosenberg and Rep. Peter Kocot to show our support. Please call today, it only takes a moment. And let us know how it goes.
N2NMA logo
Rally for the Municipal Partnership Act
You're Invited!
Rally for Municpal Partnership Act (MPA)
There will be a rally with Governor Deval Patrick speaking on Thursday, June 21st from 1-3pm in Nurses' Hall on the 2nd floor of the State House. We are fighting for the immediate passage of the MPA!

Call Your Legislator! 617-722-2000.
Hi, my name is _______. I live [or work] at _________. I am calling, because I would like you to support the Municipal Partnership Act. It will close outdated tax loopholes for telecommunications companies costing our cities and towns $78 million in taxes and give local governments more choices in raising revenue locally. Thank you. My phone number is ________.

Greetings!

Neighbor to Neighbor is supporting the Municipal Partnership Act (MPA), because it closes the outdated telecommunications loophole and gives our cities and towns choices about raising revenue locally!

There will be a rally with Governor Deval Patrick on Thursday, June 21st from 1-3pm in Nurses' Hall on the 2nd floor of the State House in support of the MPA

The two most important aspects of the bill are:

1.) Closing the Telecommunications Tax Loophole. This law, passed in 1915 to help bring telephones service to all Massachusetts residents, exempted telecommunications companies from property taxes on above ground poles and wires. The goal of this outdated tax break was accomplished years and years ago and costs the state over $78 million annually.

2.) Allowing cities and towns to make choices about local hotel and meals taxes This will give them flexibility about how to pay for local services. Right now, cities and towns can only use the regressive property tax to bring in local revenue.

Rally for Muncipal Partnership Act!
DATE: Thursday, June 21st
TIME: 1-3pm
LOCATION: Nurses Hall State House
MORE: Speaking Program 1-2pm. Meet with Local Legislators 2-3pm.

Please call or email Erin O'Leary at 617-723-6866 with any questions.

Thanks!


Neighbor to Neighbor Massachusetts
Neighbor to Neighbor Massachusetts

phone: 617-723-6866




Saturday, April 14, 2007

Northampton schools chief identifies cuts, sees need for more

Northampton schools chief identifies cuts, sees need for more
BY KRISTINA TEDESCHI , STAFF WRITER, DAILY HAMPSHIRE GAZETTE








NORTHAMPTON - In efforts to pare down a $770,000 budget gap, the superintendent plans to cut staff across the board, use the majority of school choice surplus funds and hold off on purchasing new supplies in what most School Committee members agreed were painful but necessary measures.

The resulting savings would amount to $430,000, Superintendent Isabelina Rodriguez Babcock said at Thursday night's meeting, leaving exactly $340,303 that would still need to be slashed to meet the superintendent's $27.65 million budget proposal. Although the city received $60,000 more in Chapter 70 state aid than originally expected, the money will likely land in the city's coffers, said Vice Chairwoman Lucy Hartry. She said more money from the state is unlikely.

The superintendent said she is looking to cut staff in all city schools and in the district's central office. Letters of notice are set to go out to each school once April vacation is over the week after next, she said, noting that she hasn't yet decided who to cut and where. At-large member Pamela Hunter told the committee she hoped not only staff, but also programs within the district would be considered for cuts.

In a rare move, Rodriguez Babcock recommended that $200,000 of the district's $250,000 school choice fund surplus be used to help close the gap.

"We're not comfortable with it," said at-large member Katherine Foote Newman, who also belongs to the Budget and Property Subcommittee, which had heard the recommendations last week, "but we're not comfortable with the alternatives, either."

Also under consideration is eliminating all funding for social studies materials and halting funding to administer the IOWA tests for one year.

Rodriguez Babcock decided to pass on social studies materials because the curriculum is under revision in the district and will likely be revised by the state next year, resulting in changes, she said.

However, the $200,000 earmarked for the supplies is "one-time money," the superintendent said, and new supplies will eventually be needed.

"We're only putting off the inevitable," Rodriguez Babcock said.

"If we spend it now, we won't have it next year," cautioned Ward 6 representative Lisa Minnick. She said she would be disappointed if money is not available for social studies curriculum supplies after the district puts time and effort into revising it.

"This is yet again another disaster that's been served up to us," said Minnick, "and I don't know how to fix it."

"Our deficit is a lot bigger than any of us knows how to deal with," she added.

To move forward with revision, Rodriguez Babcock said, she plans to use Title I and II state funds - which haven't been reduced and are nearly the same as last year, she said - to pay teachers and staff to work on it. Ward 2 representative Lise Glading-DiLorenzo noted hiring a director of teaching and learning in February was a smart move.

"I feel like we've made an investment in a sense that actually saves us money," she said.

Foote Newman told the committee that other recommendations were also being considered among school administrators, such as the necessity of two vice principals at Northampton High School and the practicality of heating the swimming pool at JFK Middle School and other energy costs.

The district must have a budget in place by July 1, when the next fiscal year begins.

The superintendent requested on March 22 at a special School Committee meeting that $23.4 million of her $27.65 million budget proposal come from the city, a figure that represents a 5.5 percent increase over fiscal 2007's appropriation of $22 million. But the city can only afford a 2 percent increase, Mayor Clare Higgins told committee members, or about $2.24 million more.

Monday, March 12, 2007

NEAT Now Has a Blog

Whoever said parents don't know how to navigate the web like their kids? OK, so we're not as adept at ipods or Youtube.com as some of our children. But we're proud to say we're back online and, if you're reading this, you're here as well.

With a little bit of help
from our friend Cathy (who is a great webmaster), we've transformed our NEAT website into a very user-friendly blog. If you haven't been acquainted with a blog before, it's simple and, most important for a grass roots activist group with no budget of our own -- it's free. This is how we're going to try to keep you informed about public education funding and avenues for you -- as parents, faculty, staff and community residents -- to get involved from now on.

WHAT'S GOING ON WITH FUNDING FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION THIS YEAR?
You've probably been keeping up with the articles in the press. There's some possibilities on the horizon at the State House this year with local tax options and a new governor committed to education. But there's also some alarm bells going off locally with possibilities of school budget shortfalls. A discussion of cuts is once again on the table. We'll be in touch with you as soon as we know more. But, meanwhile, we wanted to introduce you to our new blog.

LET'S KEEP IN TOUCH
Our address is above, but you can cut and paste it from here as well. We're now at http://neatonline.blogspot.com/ instead of our old web address. So please keep track of us and we'll keep you informed about how to make your voices heard. Hope you enjoy our new format. If you'd like to reach us, just leave us a comment. That's the best way to reach us these days. As we get more adept, we might even do something crazy, like paste in a photo (but that will have to wait till next time).


Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Public School Funding in Massachusetts: Putting Recent Reform Proposals in Context

June 20, 2006

A new analysis by the Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center of the most recent US Census Bureau data on state by state education financing finds that between 2002 and 2004 Massachusetts lost ground in three critical measures: spending on education as a share of total income in the state; the share of spending paid for by the state, rather than local governments; and cost-adjusted spending per pupil.

The study – the fourth edition of “Public School Funding in Massachusetts” - also discusses the changes to Chapter 70 education funding included in the FY 2007 budget proposals of the Governor, the House of Representatives, and the Senate. It examines both how the proposed changes in calculating the costs of education, local contributions, and the distribution of state education aid would address some of the shortcomings of the current system, and how they would leave other problems unresolved.

In addition, the report reviews the state education spending and inflation requirements in current law and shows that despite the proposed reforms, the budgets put forward by the Governor, the House, and the Senate fall short of the amounts called for in Section 12 of Chapter 70 of the state general laws by $276 to $322 million.

View full report at http://www.massbudget.org/Public_School_Funding_in_MA.pdf