Saturday, April 14, 2007

Northampton schools chief identifies cuts, sees need for more

Northampton schools chief identifies cuts, sees need for more
BY KRISTINA TEDESCHI , STAFF WRITER, DAILY HAMPSHIRE GAZETTE








NORTHAMPTON - In efforts to pare down a $770,000 budget gap, the superintendent plans to cut staff across the board, use the majority of school choice surplus funds and hold off on purchasing new supplies in what most School Committee members agreed were painful but necessary measures.

The resulting savings would amount to $430,000, Superintendent Isabelina Rodriguez Babcock said at Thursday night's meeting, leaving exactly $340,303 that would still need to be slashed to meet the superintendent's $27.65 million budget proposal. Although the city received $60,000 more in Chapter 70 state aid than originally expected, the money will likely land in the city's coffers, said Vice Chairwoman Lucy Hartry. She said more money from the state is unlikely.

The superintendent said she is looking to cut staff in all city schools and in the district's central office. Letters of notice are set to go out to each school once April vacation is over the week after next, she said, noting that she hasn't yet decided who to cut and where. At-large member Pamela Hunter told the committee she hoped not only staff, but also programs within the district would be considered for cuts.

In a rare move, Rodriguez Babcock recommended that $200,000 of the district's $250,000 school choice fund surplus be used to help close the gap.

"We're not comfortable with it," said at-large member Katherine Foote Newman, who also belongs to the Budget and Property Subcommittee, which had heard the recommendations last week, "but we're not comfortable with the alternatives, either."

Also under consideration is eliminating all funding for social studies materials and halting funding to administer the IOWA tests for one year.

Rodriguez Babcock decided to pass on social studies materials because the curriculum is under revision in the district and will likely be revised by the state next year, resulting in changes, she said.

However, the $200,000 earmarked for the supplies is "one-time money," the superintendent said, and new supplies will eventually be needed.

"We're only putting off the inevitable," Rodriguez Babcock said.

"If we spend it now, we won't have it next year," cautioned Ward 6 representative Lisa Minnick. She said she would be disappointed if money is not available for social studies curriculum supplies after the district puts time and effort into revising it.

"This is yet again another disaster that's been served up to us," said Minnick, "and I don't know how to fix it."

"Our deficit is a lot bigger than any of us knows how to deal with," she added.

To move forward with revision, Rodriguez Babcock said, she plans to use Title I and II state funds - which haven't been reduced and are nearly the same as last year, she said - to pay teachers and staff to work on it. Ward 2 representative Lise Glading-DiLorenzo noted hiring a director of teaching and learning in February was a smart move.

"I feel like we've made an investment in a sense that actually saves us money," she said.

Foote Newman told the committee that other recommendations were also being considered among school administrators, such as the necessity of two vice principals at Northampton High School and the practicality of heating the swimming pool at JFK Middle School and other energy costs.

The district must have a budget in place by July 1, when the next fiscal year begins.

The superintendent requested on March 22 at a special School Committee meeting that $23.4 million of her $27.65 million budget proposal come from the city, a figure that represents a 5.5 percent increase over fiscal 2007's appropriation of $22 million. But the city can only afford a 2 percent increase, Mayor Clare Higgins told committee members, or about $2.24 million more.

Close Corporate Loopholes

We've still got a chance to invest in our future and raise needed state revenues for education by closing corporate loopholes, but we need your help. Did you know that the leadership in the State House of Representatives used one-time fixes to close the budget gap instead of closing unfair corporate tax loopholes?

House Leadership rejected Governor Patrick's plan to close corporate tax loopholes - a proposal that would have raised over $600 million next year. For too long, some large corporations have been taking advantage of unintended tax loopholes to avoid paying their fair share in state taxes. The rest of us have been paying the price through increased property taxes, higher fees, and cuts to programs and services. The most important thing we can do to ensure lasting economic success and job creation is invest in health care, housing, and public education. Using money from the rainy day fund to balance the budget now is irresponsible and puts us at risk for even deeper budget cuts during the next recession.

Call Representative Peter Kocot now and ask him to support closing corporate loopholes to invest in our future. You can call him at (617) 722-2000 or email him at rep.peterkocot@hou.ma.state.us.

Remind him that you believe that to have the state funding we need to responsibly invest in education, we need long-term solutions rather than one-time fixes. Urge him to raise new revenue by closing corporate tax loopholes.

Thanks to Neighbor to Neighbor Massachusetts for making us aware of this important campaign. For more information, you can log on to their website at: http://www.n2nma.org/ Thanks to you for your support.

Monday, March 12, 2007

NEAT Now Has a Blog

Whoever said parents don't know how to navigate the web like their kids? OK, so we're not as adept at ipods or Youtube.com as some of our children. But we're proud to say we're back online and, if you're reading this, you're here as well.

With a little bit of help
from our friend Cathy (who is a great webmaster), we've transformed our NEAT website into a very user-friendly blog. If you haven't been acquainted with a blog before, it's simple and, most important for a grass roots activist group with no budget of our own -- it's free. This is how we're going to try to keep you informed about public education funding and avenues for you -- as parents, faculty, staff and community residents -- to get involved from now on.

WHAT'S GOING ON WITH FUNDING FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION THIS YEAR?
You've probably been keeping up with the articles in the press. There's some possibilities on the horizon at the State House this year with local tax options and a new governor committed to education. But there's also some alarm bells going off locally with possibilities of school budget shortfalls. A discussion of cuts is once again on the table. We'll be in touch with you as soon as we know more. But, meanwhile, we wanted to introduce you to our new blog.

LET'S KEEP IN TOUCH
Our address is above, but you can cut and paste it from here as well. We're now at http://neatonline.blogspot.com/ instead of our old web address. So please keep track of us and we'll keep you informed about how to make your voices heard. Hope you enjoy our new format. If you'd like to reach us, just leave us a comment. That's the best way to reach us these days. As we get more adept, we might even do something crazy, like paste in a photo (but that will have to wait till next time).


Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Public School Funding in Massachusetts: Putting Recent Reform Proposals in Context

June 20, 2006

A new analysis by the Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center of the most recent US Census Bureau data on state by state education financing finds that between 2002 and 2004 Massachusetts lost ground in three critical measures: spending on education as a share of total income in the state; the share of spending paid for by the state, rather than local governments; and cost-adjusted spending per pupil.

The study – the fourth edition of “Public School Funding in Massachusetts” - also discusses the changes to Chapter 70 education funding included in the FY 2007 budget proposals of the Governor, the House of Representatives, and the Senate. It examines both how the proposed changes in calculating the costs of education, local contributions, and the distribution of state education aid would address some of the shortcomings of the current system, and how they would leave other problems unresolved.

In addition, the report reviews the state education spending and inflation requirements in current law and shows that despite the proposed reforms, the budgets put forward by the Governor, the House, and the Senate fall short of the amounts called for in Section 12 of Chapter 70 of the state general laws by $276 to $322 million.

View full report at http://www.massbudget.org/Public_School_Funding_in_MA.pdf

Friday, June 9, 2006

School fees increased for sports, transportation

By Ryan Davis
Daily Hampshire Gazette
Friday, June 09, 2006
NORTHAMPTON - Parents will be paying higher fees next year for children who play sports and ride the bus, after the School Committee approved increases Thursday to help balance the budget.

Every board member except one voted for each increase, though Ward 1 representative Davina Miller spoke for many when she said, 'I hate all these fees.'

Discussion centered on the inequity of relying on certain groups - athletes and those who take the bus - to balance the budget. But members concluding that raising fees is better than cutting positions.

Due to increasing costs, the district is looking to bridge a gap of $225,000 in its proposed $26 million budget. The plan is to raise fees and cut the budget for supplies, two aides, and an elementary school band program.

The fees have now been approved, but all other parts of the budget will be finalized at the next school board meeting on June 22.

Sports fees

Athletic fees for team sports at Northampton High School are now $75 per student per sport.

Committee members voted to raise that to $125 per student for the first sport, $100 for the second sport, and $75 for the third sport. There will be a $500 per family cap on athletic fees.

By comparison, students in Amherst pay between $160 and $180 per sport, students in Easthampton pay $100 and those in South Hadley pay $75.

Business manager Susan Wright said that she projects the amount of fees collected will increase by $25,000. Committee members also approved raising the cost of tickets for sporting events by $1, generating an expected total of $11,000.

The school department has a total high school sports budget of $272,000, most of which pays the salary for the athletic director, stipends for coaches, equipment, awards and other costs. The increased fees and ticket prices will generate $96,000 towards that total, Wright said, with the rest coming from an appropriation.

Bus costs

Bus fees, which apply only to middle and high school students, will also go up next year.

For families with one child, the fee will increase from $180 to $210; for two children, the fee will go from $315 to $375; and for three children the rate will increase from $400 to $490. Wright said the increase is expected to bring in an additional $12,000.

At-large School Committee representative Kathy Foote Newman, who voted for the bus fee increase and against the athletic fee hike, pointed out how unequal the fees can be.

She said a family with three children all playing sports and riding a bus would pay $1,000 in fees. A family whose three children are in the school band and walk to school would pay nothing.

Balancing a budget: a cut and hike dance - Parents lament loss of program

By Ryan Davis
Hampshire Daily Gazette
Friday, June 09, 2006
NORTHAMPTON - A program that teaches about 130 elementary school students to play musical instruments inspired well over an hour of debate Thursday.

School Superintendent Isabelina Rodriguez Babcock has proposed eliminating the program in order to save about $17,000 in the budget. Children will still have regular music classes.

The move has the support of all four elementary principals, who maintain that while the program has produced excellent results, it doesn't benefit the majority of children and it is disruptive to classrooms because students are pulled out to participate.

However, five parents speaking during a public comment session at Thursday's School Committee meeting and two board members argued forcefully to maintain the program. Other members said they support cutting the program, but a vote won't be taken until the June 22 meeting.

''I don't think you're helping anyone by doing this,'' said Nick Kachulis of Harold Street, whose children were both in the program. ''You're destroying the feeder system to the high school band.''

Heidi Stevens of Upland Road in Leeds said that she was ''overwhelmed with gratitude'' that her son was able to develop an interest in music in elementary school and will be joining the high school band. She said eliminating the program will make some parents send their children to other schools.

Ward 5 representative Stephanie Pick said she believes that if it is cut, only children whose parents can afford lessons will learn to play instruments.

The four principals each said they'd rather not cut anything, but saw more pressing needs in schools besides band. They acknowledged that many students enjoy it, and Jackson Street School Principal Gwen Agna even plays the flute in the band at her school.

But they said dropping the program was preferable to cutting other areas.

''This is a program that doesn't really fit in the same way the rest of the elementary program fits,'' said R.K. Finn Ryan Road interim principal Margie Riddle.

Rodriguez Babcock said the program serves less than 10 percent of the elementary population and all students will still have a full music program without it.

Friday, June 2, 2006

Northampton gets upbeat budget

By Daily Hampshire Gazette
June 2, 2006

NORTHAMPTON - Mayor Clare Higgins unveiled a $67.6 million budget proposal Thursday that boosts funding in several key departments, including a 7.5 percent increase for schools, adds positions and callsfor no layoffs.

The proposal represents a 5.2 percent increase over the current year's $64 million spending plan, and 56 percent of the budget is drawn fromlocal property and motor vehicle excise taxes.

The mayor also has tapped $900,000 from the city's stabilization fund for the second consecutive year to balance the budget, leaving the citywith nearly $1 million in reserves.